
Three dark vertical panels suggesting side-by-side AI image model comparison with pink accent light
You pick Nano Banana for one draft, FLUX for another, GPT Image for a third, and you still cannot tell which model matches the brief. Tab switching burns credits and attention. TheFluxTrain’s image compare page runs the same prompt across up to four models at once, so you judge outputs in columns instead of guessing from separate tabs.
Note: Each model still costs its own credits. A three-model run is roughly the sum of three single generations. Plan prompts before you hit Generate.
Quick answer: Open Compare image models (or click Compare models on any live image model page), add up to four text-to-image models, write one prompt, set shared aspect ratio and resolution, then Generate. Each model fills its own column so you can pick a winner without retyping the prompt.
Model cards and demo galleries hide the real tradeoffs. Typography, skin texture, and prompt following only show up when the prompt and aspect ratio stay fixed. Side-by-side comparison is how you decide which model to keep for a client board, a storyboard beat, or a product still.
I build creative tools for a living, and I still waste runs by hopping between generators. A shared prompt bar with columns is the boring fix that actually sticks.
Useful links:
Two paths:
?models=nano-banana-2).Coming-soon models and upscalers do not show the link. Compare is for text-to-image models from the from-text roster (Nano Banana, Seedream, GPT Image 2, WAN 2.7 Pro, Z-Image Base, FLUX.2 Pro — the same set as /image/from-text).
What you’ll need
Steps
Example
Prompt: Mid-century living room, soft afternoon window light, oak coffee table,
editorial interior photo, 35mm, subtle film grain
Aspect: 16:9
Models: nano-banana-2, flux-2-pro, gpt-image-2
After the run, keep the winner in From Text and iterate there. Compare is for selection, not for twenty rounds of polishing.
One prompt bar drives every column:
| Control | Shared? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt | Yes | Same text for all models |
| Aspect ratio | Yes | Same crop for fair comparison |
| Resolution | Shared UI, clamped per model | Nano can use 0.5K–4K; Seedream clamps to 1K/2K; others use the studio default |
| Quality | Shown only if GPT Image 2 is selected | Applies to GPT Image 2 |
| Negative prompt | Shown only if WAN 2.7 Pro is selected | Applies to WAN only |
Credit estimate in the prompt bar is the sum across selected models. If you are short, drop a column before you generate.
A useful compare run:
Weak runs look like four unrelated style prompts in one session, or four models you already know you will not ship.
If you need a full pipeline after you choose a model — characters, video, edit timeline — Explore templates still apply. Compare is the selection step before that workflow.
Up to four. Add models from the header until you hit the limit; remove one before adding another if you need to swap.
Yes. One floating prompt sends the same text (and shared aspect ratio) to every selected model so the columns stay fair.
The text-to-image set from Image → From Text: Nano Banana 2, Nano Banana Pro, Seedream 5 Pro, GPT Image 2, WAN 2.7 Pro, Z-Image Base, and FLUX.2 Pro.
You pay for each model’s generation. The credit badge shows the total for the current selection before you click Generate.
Not yet. This page is image-only. Video-to-video compare is planned as a separate surface.
On an available image model page, click Compare models next to All models. You land on /image/compare with that model already in a column.
Pick a shared resolution in the prompt bar. The app clamps per model (for example Seedream will not take 4K even if Nano is set to 4K).
Use compare to shortlist. Once you have a winner, move to From Text or your usual studio for longer iteration and reference workflows.